[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat Tıp Dergisi
2015, Cilt 20, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 057-059
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
Degenerated Primary Retroperitoneal Leiomyoma: A Rare Case
Oktay UÇER1, Bilal GUMUS1, Hasan AYDEDE2, Ali Rıza KANDILOGLU3
1Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, Manisa, Turkey
2Celal Bayar University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery, Manisa, Turkey
3Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Manisa, Turkey
Keywords: Retroperitoneal space, Degenerated leiomyoma, Retroperitoneal leiomyoma, Retroperitoneal alan, Dejeneratif leiyomyom, Retroperitoneal leiyomyom
Summary
Primary retroperitoneal leiomyomas are a very rare clinical condition. We present the case of degenerated primary leiomyoma in retroperitoneal area. A 33-year-old primiparous woman presented with chronic constipation. On examination, there was a large firm unpainful palpable lumbar mass in the left side. The diagnostic workup included contrast computer tomography, transabdominal ultrasonography, and colonoscopy that revealed a 7,5-cm heterogeneous retroperitoneal tumor in the left infrarenal area. At laparotomy, the mass arising from the retroperitoneum was excised. Histopathology showed a degenerated leiomyoma. Preoperative imaging can only give provisional diagnosis and can be misguiding. Considering current limitations in radiological diagnosis, surgical excision of these tumors is necessary to rule out malignancy.
  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Introduction
    Leiomyomas are benign smooth muscle tumors that usually arise from the uterus being the most common benign tumors in women. However, primary leiomyoma of the retroperitoneum without the co-existence of uterine leiomyoma or disseminated disease is very rare1. When a retroperitoneal mass is detected in the scan, these tumors are usually believed to be malignant. Also, preoperative diagnosis of a retroperitoneal leiomyoma is rarely possible2. We report a rare case of a degenerated retroperitoneal leiomyoma.
  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Case Presentation
    A 33-year-old primiparous woman was presented to the department of gastroenterology at our hospital with the 3-month history of constipation. Colonoscopy revealed a partial obstruction at the distal end of the descending colon without mucosa involvement. A heterogeneous retroperitoneal mass in the left lumbar area was found on the abdominal ultrasound. She was referred to our clinic with the suspicion of retroperitoneal malignancy. On examination, there was a large firm unpainful palpable lumbar mass in the left side. Computer tomography demonstrated a retroperitoneal mass of 8x6x5 cm located inferior to the left renal with compression of the descending colon (Figure 1). Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the finding of the computer tomography (Figure 2). Routine laboratory investigations and tumor markers including alpha-fetoprotein, CEA, CA 19-9, CA-125 were revealed to be within normal range. Chest X-ray did reveal no pathologic finding. Ultrasound guided tru-cut biopsy was performed from the retroperitoneal mass, and pathologic examination of the specimen revealed hypocellular connective tissue and a very little striated muscle, however the specimen was inadequate for tissue diagnosis.


    Click Here to Zoom
    Figure 1: Computer tomography shows a retroperitoneal mass.


    Click Here to Zoom
    Figure 2: Magnetic resonance imaging shows a retroperitoneal mass.

    At laparotomy, an encapsulated firm tumor without renal and descending colon connection but adhesive to the psoas muscle was found, arising from the left retroperitoneal region at the L3-L5 level of the spine. The descending colon was compressed partially by the mass and the proximal section of the descending colon did not dilate. There was no connection of the tumor to the genital tract. The mass of size 8x5x5 cm was excised by both blunt and sharp dissection (Figure 3). The postoperative period of the patient was uneventful. On gross examination it was a solid, well-circumscribed and firm mass. Microscopically, the lesion were consisted of vast areas of hyalinization with very few foci having barely recognizable smooth muscle bundles (Figure 4). The patient was examined 2 weeks after the procedure. She had no sign of urinary and bowel dysfunction. There has been no sign of recurrence and the patient remains asymptomatic for 3 months. The patient provided written consent to use the information for the case report.


    Click Here to Zoom
    Figure 3: Macroscopic appearance of the mass after surgical removal.


    Click Here to Zoom
    Figure 4: Within intensely hyalinized stroma attenuated smooth muscle cells are seen. H&E stain x 20.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Discussion
    Leiomyoma is more frequently found in the fourth and fifth decades of life, and the uterine corpus is the most common site of location. However, leiomyomas occasionally occur with unusual growth patterns or in unusual locations3. Although there have been reports on various atypical localizations for leiomyomas, their growth in the retroperitoneum is extremely rare. It could be related to uterine leiomyomas since more than 40% of patients with retroperitoneal leiomyoma have a concurrent uterine leiomyoma or a history of hysterectomy for leiomyoma4. The pelvis is the most common location for retroperitoneal leiomyoma (73%). The leiomyoma in the present case is extremely rare, because of the localization and history. The leiomyoma was not in pelvis and was not related to a concurrent uterine leiomyoma or a history of hysterectomy for leiomyoma.

    Etiology and pathogenesis of leiomyomas are still poorly understood. Since these tumors probably arise from smooth muscle cells, including those in blood vessel walls, they can originate wherever smooth muscle cells exist1. Zaitoon explained that uterine leiomyomas that adhere to surrounding structures acquire an auxiliary blood supply and become detached from the uterus5. Such leiomyomas have been termed “parasitic” leiomyomas. Stutterecker et al. speculated that embryonal remnants (e.g., the tubes of Müller or Wolff) or local vessel musculature might be responsible for the development of retroperitoneal leiomyomas6.

    Retroperitoneal leiomyoma may enlarge considerably, yet remain asymptomatic and be detected incidentally at a routine check-up or autopsy. The most common clinical feature of a retroperitoneal leiomyoma is palpation of a pelvic mass, which is present in nearly 90% of patients3. Although this patient had chronic constipation, the findings of the colonoscopy and intraoperative visual inspection showed that the compression of the mass in the descending colon could not cause chronic constipation.

    Although preoperative imaging and gross appearance are frequently typical for uterine leiomyomas, retroperitoneal leiomyomas are frequently misdiagnosed as malignant tumors. Ultrasonographyc examination provides good initial orientation for retroperitoneal masses. Computer tomography and especially magnetic resonance imaging are most useful screening tools in evaluating and distinguishing the exact nature of the tumor and its relationship with adjacent organs and vascular structures. However, no radiological diagnostic modality appears highly sensitive or specific in ruling out malignancy and differential diagnosis on the basis of radiological finding alone is difficult1. For the expectant management of asymptomatic patients refusing operation, ultrasonography or computer tomography-guided fine-needle aspiration or biopsy may be histologically beneficial. Complete tumor excision with pathologic investigations is still the mainstay for diagnosis and treatment7.

    If a retroperitoneal mass is diagnosed as leiomyoma either preoperatively or intraoperatively, the surgeon should excise the tumor as completely as possible, especially in symptomatic patients. However, the tumor can displace important retroperitoneal and vascular structures; therefore, sometimes resection of the tumor might be incomplete2. Abdominal hysterectomy along with the resection depends on the age of the patient, her symptomatology, and associated uterine myoma8. We excised only the mass because it did not connection any organs or structures.

    Retroperitoneal leiomyomas of located outside the pelvis are extremely rare and generally detected incidentally at a routine check-up. No radiological diagnostic modality appears highly sensitive or specific in ruling out malignancy and differential diagnosis on the basis of radiological finding alone is difficult. Complete tumor excision with pathologic investigations is still the mainstay for diagnosis and treatment.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Discussion
  • References
  • References

    1) Radojkoviæ M, Stojanoviæ M, Gligorijevioæ J, et al. Giant primary retroperitoneal myxoid leiomyoma: a case report. Vojnosanit Pregl 2013; 70: 522-5.

    2) Dursun P, Salman MC, Taskiran C, Yüce K, Ayhan A. Retroperitoneal leiomyomatosis: a case report. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2005; 15: 1222-5.

    3) Kang WD, Kim SM, Kim YH, Choi HS. Three isolated, large retroperitoneal leiomyomas. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280: 499-501.

    4) Poliquin V, Victory R, Vilos GA. Epidemiology, presentation and management of retroperitoneal leiomyomata: systematic literature review and case report. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 152-60.

    5) Zaitoon MM. Retroperitoneal parasitic leiomyoma causing unilateral ureteral obstruction. J Urol 1986; 135: 130-1.

    6) Stutterecker D, Umek W, Tunn R, Sulzbacher I, Kainz C. Leiomyoma of the space of Retzius: a report of 2 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 248-9.

    7) Lin HW, Su WC, Tsai MS, Cheong ML. Pelvic retroperitoneal leiomyoma. Am J Surg 2010; 199: 36-8.

    8) Mahendru R, Gaba G, Yadav S, Gaba G, Gupta C. A rare case of retroperitoneal leiomyoma. Case Rep Surg 2012; 2012: 425280.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Discussion
  • References
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]