Hipoaktif Soliter Tiroid Nodüllerinde İnce İğne Aspirasyon Sitolojisi ve Histopatolojik Sonuçların Karşılaştırılması
Regional Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pathology, Erzurum, Turkey
Anahtar Kelimeler: Hypoactive solitary thyroid nodule, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Histopathology, Hipoaktif soliter tiroid nodülü, İnce iğne aspirasyon sitolojisi, Histopatoloji
4.212 görüntülenme 2.992 indirme
Gereç ve Yöntem: Hipoaktif soliter tiroid nodüllerinde tiroid maliğnensilerinin tespiti için hastane kayıtları kapsamlı bir şekilde gözden geçirilerek tiroid ince iğne sensitivitesi değerlendirildi. Bu 2001 Aralık'tan 2008 Haziran'a kadarki ardışık 62 hasta üzerinde yapılan bir prospektif çalışmaydı. Klinik olarak soliter tiroid nodülü teşhis edilen, klinik, radyolojik ve biyokimyasal olarak hipotiroidik olan tüm hastalar çalışmaya dahil edildi. Multinodüler guatr, ötiroid ve hipertiroidli hastalar çalışmaya dahil edilmedi.
Bulgular: Neoplastik hipoaktif soliter tiroid nodüllerinin teşhisi için yapılan ince iğne aspirasyon sitolojisinin sensitivite, spesifite, doğruluk oranı, yalancı pozitiflik, yalancı negatiflik, pozitif kestirim değeri ve negatif kestirim değeri sırasıyla 80,7 %, 88,8 %, 85,4 %, 11,1%, 19,2 %, 80,7 %, ve 88,8 % idi. Sekiz hastada tespit edilen en sık malignite tiroidin papiller karsinomu idi.
Sonuç: İnce iğne aspirasyon sitolojisi tiroid kanserlerinin teşhisinde basit, kolay yapılan, etkili ve kolay tekrarlanan bir yöntemdir. İnce iğne aspirasyon sitolojisi hipoaktif soliter tiroid nodüllerinin malignite açısından teşhis edilmesinde ilk olarak akla getirilmelidir.
Materials and Methods: A comprehensive view of hospitalization records was performed that have assessed the sensitivity of FNA for detecting thyroid malignancy in hypoactive solitary thyroid nodules. This was a prospective study conducted on 62 consecutive patients between December 2001 and June 2008. All patients with clinically diagnosed solitary thyroid nodule who were clinically, radyologically and biochemically hypothyroid were included for study. Patients with multinodular goitre, euthyroid and hyperthyroid were excluded from the study.
Results: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, false positive rate, false negative rate, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FNAC for the diagnosis of neoplastic hypoactive solitary thyroid nodules were 80,7 %, 88,8 %, 85,4 %, 11,1%, 19,2 %, 80,7 %, and 88,8 %, respectively. The most common malignancy detected was papillary carcinoma of thyroid in 8 patients.
Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration cytology is a simple, easy to perform, cost effective, and easily repeated procedure for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer. It is recommended as the first line investigation for the diagnosis of hypoactive solitary thyroid nodule.
Introduction
In this report we correlated the FNAC findings with histopathology of patients with hypoactive solitary thyroid nodule who underwent surgery.
Materials and Methods
Results
Table 1: Characteristics of the patients presented with clinically hypoactive solitary thyroid nodule.
Table 2: Nonneoplastic lesions diagnosed by FNAC and their comparison with histopathological diagnosis.
Table 3: Benign or suspicious neoplastic lesions diagnosed by FNAC and their comparison with histopathological diagnosis.
Table 4: Summary of false positive and false negative results of FNAC.
Table 5: Statistical analysis for neoplastic lesions.
Table 6: Statistical analysis for carcinomatous lesions.
Discussion
Table 7: Comparison of results of present study with previous studies.
The methods used for the calculation of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were similar to previous studies28,29. Sensitivity and accuracy of FNAC for detection of neoplasm were 80% and 84%, respectively, whereas they were 76% and 69%, respectively, in a study by Cusick et al.29.
In the present study 14 cases were found to be malignant on histopathological examination (10 papillary carcinoma, 2 follicular carcinoma and 2 hurthle cell carcinoma). It is to be stressed that all cases of papillary carcinoma diagnosed by FNAC were also papillary carcinoma on histopathological examination. This is in accordance with previous studies13,30. The incidence of malignancy in this study was 22,5% which is in accordance with study by Dorairajan and Jayashree13. The incidence of malignancy can be as high as 43.6%25.
The incidence of papillary carcinoma in the present study was 71,4%. In the literature, incidence of papillary carcinoma varies from 50% to 80%13,25,31. Brooks et al. found that preoperative FNAC had no direct impact on the selection of the surgical procedure and intraoperative frozen section added very little to surgical management32.
Analysis of data from seven series showed a false-negative rate of 1% to 11%, a false-positive rate of 1% to 8%, a sensitivity of 65% to 98%, and a specificity of 72% to 100%23. The results are consistent with this study.
FNAC provides useful information and may be used along with other clinical information to decide best form of treatment in a hypoactive solitary thyroid nodule. The use of FNAC has reduced the number of patients with solitary thyroid nodules undergoing unnecessary surgery and has led to proper planning of surgery in malignant cases. I concluded that FNAC diagnosis of malignancy is highly significant and such patients should be subjected to surgery. A benign FNAC diagnosis should be viewed with caution as false negative results do occur and these patients should be followed up and any clinical suspicion of malignancy even in the presence of benign FNAC requires surgery.
References
1)Rojeski MT, Gharib H. Nodular thyroid disease. Evalution and
2)management. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 428–36.
3)Gharib H, Goellner JR. Evaluation of nodular thyroid disease.
4)Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1988; 17: 511–26.
5)Mazzaferri EL. Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N
6)Engl J Med 1993; 328: 553–59.
7)Hegedüs L. The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 2004; 351;
8)1764–71.
9)Gharib H, Papini E. Thyroid nodules: clinical importance,
10)assessment, and treatment. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am
11)2007; 36: 707–35.
12)Goellner JR, Gharib H, Grant CS. Fine needle aspiration
13)cytology of the thyroid, 1980 to 1986. Acta Cytol 1987; 31:
14)587–90.
15)Ravetto C, Colombo L, Dottorni ME. Usefulness of fineneedle
16)aspiration in the diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. A retrospective
17)study in 37.895 patients. Cancer 2000; 90: 357–63.
18)Oertel YC. “Fine-needle aspiration and the diagnosis of thyroid
19)cancer”. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1996; 25: 69–91.
20)Ridgway EC. Clinical evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules,
21)in The Thyroid: A Fundamental and Clinical Text, GB Lippincott,
22)Philadelphia, Pa, USA 1986; 1377–85.
23)Bakhos R, Selvaggi SM, DeJong S, et al. Fine needle aspiration
24)of the thyroid: rate and causes of cytopathologic discordance.
25)Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 233–37.
26)Agrawal S. Diagnostic accuracy and role of fine needle aspiration
27)cytology in management of thyroid nodules. J Surg Oncol
28)1995; 58: 168–72.
29)Morgan JL, Serpell JW, Cheng MSP. Fine-needle aspiration
30)cytology of thyroid nodules: how useful is it? ANZ J Surg
31)2003; 73: 480–83.
32)Dorairajan N, Jayashree N. Solitary nodule of the thyroid and
33)the role of fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis. J Indian
34)Med Assoc 1996; 94: 50–2.
35)Nggada H, Musa A, Gali B, Khalil M. “Fine needle aspiration
36)cytology of thyroid nodule (S): a Nigerian tertiary hospital
37)experience”. Internet Journal of Pathology 2006; 5.
38)Tabaqchali MA, Hanson JM, Johnson SJ, Wadehra V, Lennard
39)TWJ, Proud G. Thyroid aspiration cytology in Newcastle:
40)a six year cytology/histology correlation study. Ann R Coll
41)Surg Engl 2000; 82: 149–55.
42)Nasuti JF, Gupta PK, Baloch ZW. Diagnostic value and costeffectiveness
43)of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration
44)specimens: review of 5,688 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27:
45)1-4.
46)Cappelli C, Pirola I, Gandossi E, de Martino E, Agosti B,
47)Castellano M. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodule:
48)does the needle matter? South Med J 2009; 102: 498–
49)501.
50)Moslavac S, Matesa N, Kusi´c Z. Hyroid fine needle aspiration
51)cytology in children and adolescents. Coll Antropol 2010;
52)34: 197–200.
53)Castro MR, Gharib H. Continuing controversies in the management
54)of thyroid nodules. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 926–31.
55)Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management
56)approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on
57)thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 226–31.
58)Ko HM, Jhu IK, Yang SH, Lee JH, Nam JH, Juhng SW, Choi
59)C. Clinicopathologic analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology
60)of the thyroid. A review of 1613 cases and correlation
61)with histopathologic diagnoses. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 727–32.
62)Frates MC, Benson CB, Charboneau JW, et al. Management
63)of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in
64)Ultraound consensus conference statement. Radiology 2005;
65)237: 794–800.
66)Gharib H, Goellner JR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the
67)thyroid: an appraisal. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 282–89.
68)Rosen JE, Stone MD. Contemporary diagnostic approach to
69)the thyroid nodule. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94: 649–61.
70)Bouvet M, Feldman JI, Gill GN, et al. Surgical management of
71)the thyroid nodule: patient selection based on the results of fine-
72)needle aspiration cytology. Laryngoscope 1992; 102:
73)1353–56.
74)Hamaker RC, Singer MI, DeRossi RV, Shockley WW. Role of
75)needle biopsy in thyroid nodules. Arch Otolaryngol 1983; 109:
76)225–28.
77)Radetic M, Kralj Z, Padovan I. Reliability of aspiration biopsy
78)in thyroid nodes: study of 2190 operated patients. Tumori
79)1984; 70: 271–76.
80)Al-Sayer HM, Krukowski ZH, Williams VM, Matheson NA.
81)Fine needle aspiration cytology in isolated thyroid swellings: a
82)prospective two year evaluation. Br Med J 1985; 290: 1490–92.
83)Cusick EL, MacIntosh CA, Krukowski ZH, Williams VMM,
84)Ewen SWB, Matheson NA. Management of isolated thyroid
85)swelling: a prospective six year study of fine needle aspiration
86)cytology in diagnosis. Br Med J 1990; 301: 318–21.
87)Kessler A, Gavriel, H. Zahav S, et al. Accuracy and consistency
88)of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and
89)management of solitary thyroid nodules. Isr Med Assoc J
90)2005; 7: 371–73.
91)De Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel RJ, Bouvy ND, Bonjer HJ,
92)Van Muiswinkel JM, Chadha S. Fine needle aspiration cytology
93)of thyroid nodules: how accurate is it and what are the
94)causes of discrepant cases? Cytopathology 2001; 12: 399–405.
95)Brooks AD, Shaha AR, DuMornay W, et al. Role of fineneedle
96)aspiration biopsy and frozen section analysis in the surgical
97)management of thyroid tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2001; 8: 92–100.
© 2013 Fırat Tıp Dergisi. Tüm hakları saklıdır.

