Smoking is a health hazard that has been widely recognized. Despite global antismoking campaigns, some people continue to smoke regularly. Smoking is divided into two phases: the particulate and gaseous phases. A lit cigarette generates approximately 4000 compounds through various processes such as pyrolysis, hydrogenation, decarboxylation, oxidation, and dehydration. The main constituents affecting health are car-bon monoxide in the gaseous phase, nicotine, and tar in the particulate phase
16. Evidence also shows that the toxins found in cigarette smoke may not be exclusively responsible for the adverse effects of smoking. In fact, a study that investigated the impacts of oral nicotine on male rats showed that rats exposed to oral nicotine experienced a significant reduction in sperm count and sperm motility
17. Therefore, nicotine may also adversely affect fertility and is not dependent on the toxins found in cigarette smoke.
It is interesting that there was an improvement in the parameters that were impacted by oral nicotine after 30 days of cessation, showing a component of reversibility to these impacts. In addition, a study on 210 men showed that men with higher concentrations of cotinine in the seminal plasma also had a higher percentage of abnormal sperm morphology18. Since cotinine is a nicotine metabolite, these findings support the hypot-hesis that nicotine itself may possibly lead to the adver-se effects of smoking on fertility. In a society where males dominate, females usually carry the burden of infertility, though in most cases, the male counterpart also contributes to infertility. Soares et al.19, who reviewed the literature on the association between smoking and reproductive function, focused on strong evidence indicating that cigarette smoking negatively affected female and male fertility. Ramlau-Hansen et al.20 conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 2542 healthy men during 1987–2004 and found that the semen analysis showed that cigarette smokers had lower sperm counts, semen volumes, and motile sperm percentages than the men who did not smoke. It was also suggested that the association between smoking and sperm concentration was dosedependent. In a case-control study, there was an association between smoking and impaired motility of spermatozoa, reduced semen concentration, and a higher morphology defect21. In addition, an article published by the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists showed that abnormal structural defects of spermatozoa, especially round head defects, were associated with tobacco smo-king due to a lack of sufficient scavenging antioxidant enzymes and higher oxidative stress in the infertile men's seminal fluids 22. Another study that evaluated the impact of smoking on vital seminal parameters influencing fertility showed that smoking impaired motility more than impaired sperm count23. A meta-analysis assessing human semen found that tobacco smoking negatively affected semen parameters24. The analysis of 5865 infertile and fertile men found impaired motility and a lower sperm count in the semen samples of these young men. In summary, the possible mechanisms involved with the impact of smo-king on semen parameters are that the toxic contents of cigarettes harmfully affect the male germ cells and their developmental processes25.
In a meta-analysis evaluating 16 studies with a total of 10823 infertile men (5 257 smokers and 5 566 non-smokers) as participants, it was found that oligozoos-permia and morphological defects of spermatozoa were more common in smokers compared with non-smokers26. In a retrospective study of 296 infertile men in our country, Ozgur et al.27 reported that morpholo-gic evaluation revealed better results for the nonsmo-kers than the heavy smokers in terms of tail anomalies and percent of coiled tails.
In the current study, we examined the effects of smoking on sperm parameters in 1005 men with suspected infertility. As far as we know, this study is the most extensive one conducted in the Diyarbakir region. BMI was higher in the non-smoker group than in the smoker group (Table 1). Comparing sperm parameters between smokers and non-smokers, there was no significant difference between groups (Table 2). When we examined the effects of daily smoking on sperm parameters, we found no significant difference between the group that smoked up to 30 cigarettes per day and the group that smoked more than 30 cigarettes (Table 3). We also analyzed the smoker group by separating it according to the duration of smoking. We observed that non-progressive motility was the lowest and immotility was the highest in smokers who had been smoking for 20 years or more (Table 4).
Study Limitations
Our study is not devoid of limitations. In this study, the results of individuals with a suspicion of infertility who applied to the hospital are shown. Consequently, this study's participants have male infertility problems. These results may not show the association between the individuals' smoking status in the entire population and the sperm parameters. Furthermore, one of the limitations of this study is that it may not evaluate parameters thought to affect the participants' smoking habits, such as anxiety and depression. There should be a multidisciplinary approach to identify and inform those exposed to infertility, which has an important place in society.