Approval from the local ethics committee was obtained on September 14, 2023 (Reference number: E-50716828-100-375654). G*Power software was used for statistical power analysis to estimate the sample size. The calculation, based on a significance level (alpha) of 0.05, indicated that 289 participants would be sufficient to achieve 95% statistical power. To ensure robust power, a total of 300 individuals were initially recruited. The patient group consisted of 154 women diagnosed with vitamin D deficiency who visited the internal medicine clinic of Elazığ Fethi Sekin City Hospital between September 2023 and January 2024, met the study criteria, and had not received any treatment. The healthy control group included 158 women who presented to the same hospital for annual check-ups and had no significant medical issues. This group was frequency-matched to the patient group based on age, gender, educational status, and socioeconomic back ground to minimize potential confounding effects. All participants were initially evaluated by an internal medicine specialist. This was followed by structured clinical interviews conducted by a psychiatrist according to DSM-5 criteria, each lasting approximately 30 minutes. The inclusion criteria for the patient group were: being a woman aged 18–65 years, having no organic, neurological, or psychiatric diseases, and having no intellectual disability that could impair cognitive function. A diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency was required, with no other comorbid diagnoses. To avoid confounding effects related to comorbidity and to maintain diagnostic specificity, participants with any additional psychiatric diagnoses based on DSM-5 criteria—as assessed through the structured clinical interviews—were excluded. Patients who had used medications such as vitamin D, calcium, or parathyroid hormone in the past year were also excluded. Four participants in the patient group who did not complete the study questionnaires and eight individuals in the control group who declined to participate were excluded from the final analysis. Consequently, the final study sample comprised 150 women with vitamin D deficiency and 150 healthy women in the control group. After obtaining written informed consent from all participants, the Clinical Data Form, the Turkish version of the ASRS-v1.1, and the WURS-25 were administered. Serum 25(OH) vitamin D levels were measured for all participants.
The Scales Used in the Study:
Sociodemographic and Clinical Data Form: Sociodemographic and Clinical Data Form: This semistructured form, created by the researchers, gathers important sociodemographic information from respondents, including age, economic status, and marital status. It also collects clinical data, such as psychiatric disease history and smoking history.
Turkish Version of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1): This scale24, developed by the World Health Organization to screen for mental disorders, measures the severity of ADHD symptoms in adulthood. The questions in this scale aim to identify a person's mental symptoms over the past six months. The scale was adapted to Turkish, and its validity and reliability were demonstrated25.
Wender Utah Rating Scale - Short Form (WURS-25):
This scale was designed to assess the presence and severity of childhood ADHD signs and symptoms in adults26. It's important to note that the scale evaluates adults' experiences during childhood and cannot be used for diagnosing adults based solely on the score. The scale has been adapted into Turkish, and its validity and reliability have been confirmed27. When a score of 36 or above is used as the cutoff point, the scale can accurately classify 82.5% of adults with ADHD, 90.8% of the control group (specificity), 66% of individuals with depression, and 64.3% of those with bipolar disorder.
Statistical analysis:
Statistical analyses were conducted using version 14.0 of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Continuous variables were assessed for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and histograms. Normally distributed parameters were compared using Student's t-test, while parameters that did not follow a normal distribution were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using either the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, depending on the situation.
The strength of the relationship between two variables was evaluated with Spearman's or Pearson's correlation coefficient. A statistical difference was considered significant when the p-value was less than 0.05. To assess the ability of vitamin D levels to predict a higher score on the Wender Utah Rating Scale, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. The accuracy of the tests was measured by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). An AUC close to 1 indicates a perfect diagnostic test, whereas an AUC of 0.5 suggests the test is not useful.