[ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]
Fırat Tıp Dergisi
2026, Cilt 31, Sayı 1, Sayfa(lar) 084-086
[ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
A Rare Case of Trauma in Association of Atlantooccipital Assimilation and Accessory Articulation: Multiple Isolated Spinous Process Fractures
Samet DİNÇ1, Adem KURTULUŞ2, Necmettin ÇOBAN1, Muammer YAKUPOĞLU2
1Afyon State Hospital, Neurosurgery Clinic, Afyon, Turkey
2Düzce University, Department of Neurosurgery, Düzce, Turkey
Keywords: Oksipitalizasyon, Asimilasyon, Clay-shoveler's, Occipitalization, Assimilation, Clay-shoveler's
Summary
Atlantooccipital fusion or occipitalization or assimilation of the atlas is a rare congenital anomaly demonstrated in anatomical, radiological, and morphological studies. Clay-shoveler's fracture, which is an isolated multiple fracture of the cervical and thoracic vertebrae, and this fusion association is extremely rare and we had an opportunity to understand the mechanism of Clay-shoveler's fracture.

A 58 years-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department due to a hyperflexion injury as a result of a traffic accident. Multiple spinous process fractures were detected at the C3-C5-C6-T1-T2-T3-T4 levels on computed tomography images. In addition, there was an image of atlantooccipital assimilation at the craniovertebral junction.

Multiple levels spinous process fractures are extremely rare lesions that occur as a result of direct trauma or repetitive traction. They are usually conservative without the need for surgery. However, as in our case, a more detailed neuroradiological examination should be performed to detect accompanying incidental anomalies or more serious spinal traumas.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Introduction
    Atlantooccipital fusion or occipitalization or assimilation of the atlas is a rare congenital anomaly demonstrated in anatomical, radiological, and morphological studies. It is seen between 0.12% and 0.72%1. It develops as a result of the failure of segmentation between the fourth occipital and first cervical sclero-tomas. Assimilation can be complete or incomplete. Isolated spinous process fractures of the cervical and thoracic vertebrae are defined as Clay-shoveler’s fractures2. There is an avulsion-type injury on the interspinous ligaments. Although this type of injury is rare, it usually occurs after a trauma or sports injury3,4. Fractures at multiple levels are less common5. These fractures are stable conditions and are usually treated conservatively. In addition, isolated spinous process fractures are considered a warning for more severe spinal injuries. Therefore, careful evaluation is required to detect more serious spinal injuries in these cases2.

    In this case, we presented a case with congenital atlantooccipital assimilation and multiple fractures of the cervical and thoracic spine spinous processes after trauma (A written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report).

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Case Presentation
    A 58 years-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department due to a hyperflexion injury as a result of a traffic accident. At the time of admission, the patient had pain with palpation on the spinous processes in the cervical and thoracic regions. Neurological examination was normal and there were no defects in motor and sensory examination in all extremities. There was also no sign of blunt trauma. Multiple spinous process fractures were detected at the C3-C5-C6-T1-T2-T3-T4 levels on computed tomography (CT) images (Figure 1).


    Click Here to Zoom
    Figure 1: Spinous process fractures are seen on sagittal CT image.

    In addition, there was an image of atlantooccipital assimilation at the craniovertebral junction. The diagnosis of this congenital anomaly was made incidentally. There was also C1-occipital accessory articulation (Figure 2)6.


    Click Here to Zoom
    Figure 2: A) In coronal CT image, arrow indicates atlantoocipital assimilastion and star indicates the accessory C1-occipital articulation. B) Atlantooccipital assimilation in sagittal CT image shown by arrow.

    No other additional pathology was observed in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patient was hospitalized for 48 hours and discharged with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and analgesic treatment. She used cervical and thoracic corsets for 8 weeks by applying conservative treatment. After 6 months of follow-up the patient, whose pain complaint decreased and improved over time, had no loss of function observed in daily living activities. The visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain improved from 8/10 to 2/10.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Disscussion
  • References
  • Discussion
    Clay-shoveler’s fracture has been reported under different names in the literature in the early twentieth century in English trenchers, French soil workers, and German retired workers7. Clay-shoveler’s fracture is very rare and C7 and T1 vertebrae are frequently affected. The spinous processes of these vertebrae are thinner and longer than the other vertebrae at close levels. Therefore, the risk of developing fractures is higher due to repetitive stress and strong trauma7. Excessive hyperflexion-hyperextension or sudden forceful contractions of the trapezius and rhomboid minor muscle groups in trauma cause fractures7,8. In our case, there was a hyperflexion mechanism of the head during the traffic accident. The pain is usually sharp, radiating from the midline bilaterally to the shoulders and arms. Patients typically tend to keep the neck slightly bent and the shoulders elevated. Neck and shoulder movements are painful. Neurological deficits may be seen due to accompanying pathologies9. A neurological examination of our case was normal and she typically had severe pain. No concomitant traumatic pathology was observed. However, incidentally, atlantooccipital assimilation was observed. Although direct radiography is mostly sufficient in the diagnosis, it is necessary to apply CT and MRI to diagnose more serious additional spine and soft tissue injuries. In addition, direct radiographs may give an inadequate image, as patients tend to keep their shoulders up10. MRI is particularly useful in demonstrating ligament damage. Anterior longitudinal ligament and anterior annulus fibrosus injuries can also be seen after hyperflexion-hyperextension injuries (2). In our case, there was a spinous process fracture at C3-C5-C6-T1-T2-T3-T4 levels on CT images. There was no additional bone pathology except atlantooccipital fusion. We did not detect ligament damage or any other pathology on MRI images.

    The atlantooccipital joint is between the superior articular facet of the atlas and the occipital condyles. Although they are two separate joints, they move together. It is primarily responsible for movement in the sagittal plane. Flexion is limited by the dens axis corresponding to the anterior margin of the foramen magnum, and extension by tectorial membrane tension. The alar ligaments restrict the lateral and rotational movements of this junction to about 5 degrees.

    Neurological disorders often occur in the 3rd and 4th decades of life in the patient with atlantooccipital assimilation. Symptoms such as ataxia, numbness, and pain may occur by compression of the spinal cord due to soft tissue and bone structure abnormalities11. However, we did not see spinal cord compression in our case and she did not have any symptoms. In addition, rheumatology consultation was requested in our case and rheumatological disease was not considered.

    We mentioned that hyperflexion injuries are involved in the etiology of such cases. Since there was also atlantooccipital assimilation in our case, we thought that movement was restricted at the craniovertebral junction due to hyperflexion injury and the tension force was concentrated in the posterior spine. Therefore, we concluded that multiple-level spinous process fractures occur and especially affect upper cervical levels. When we analyzed the literature, we did not find a similar case.

    In conclusion, multiple levels spinous process fractures are extremely rare lesions that occur as a result of direct trauma or repetitive traction. They are usually conservative without the need for surgery. However, as in our case, a more detailed neuroradiological examination should be performed to detect accompanying incidental anomalies or more serious spinal traumas.

    Availability of data and materials:
    Data and material are available on a reasonable request from the author.

    Abbreviations:
    CT: Computed tomography
    MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging
    NSAID: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
    VAS: Visual analog scale

    Funding: Nil.

    Contributions: All authors contributed equally.

    Ethics declarations
    Ethics approval and consent to participate: Approval has been taken from the ethics committee.

    Consent for publication: The patient's consent was obtained for publication.

    Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Acknowledgements: Not applicable.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Discussion
  • References
  • References

    1) Sharma DK, Sharma D, Sharma S. Atlantooccipital Fusion: Prevalence and its Developmental and Clinical Correlation. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: AC01-3.

    2) Solaroğlu I, Kaptanoğlu E, Okutan Ö, Beşkonaklı E. Multiple isolated spinous process fracture (Clay-shoveler's fracture) of cervical spine: a case report. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2007; 13: 62-4.

    3) Hetsroni I, Mann G, Dolev E, Morgernstern D, Nyska M. Clay shoveler's fracture in a volleyball player. Phys Sportsmed 2005; 33: 38-42.

    4) Kang DH, Lee SH. Multiple spinous process fractures of the thoracic vertebrae (Clay-Shoveler's Fracture) in a beginning Golfer: A Case Report. Spine 2009; 34: 534-7.

    5) Pinto EM, Teixeira A, Frada R, Sousa R. Veigas T, Miranda A. Multiple contiguous spinous process fractures, a case report and literature review. Trauma Case Rep 2022; 42: 100683.

    6) Ludinghausen M, Fahr M, Prescher A et al. Accessory joints between basiocciput and atlas/axis in the median plane. Clin Anat 2005; 18: 558-71.

    7) Boer JP, Palthe AW, Stadhouder A, Bloemers F. The Clay Shoveler's Fracture: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Emerg Med 2016; 51: 292-7.

    8) Umredkar A, Sura S, Mohindra S. Multiple contiguous isolated spinous process fracture (Clay-Shoveler's fracture) of the cervicodorsal spine. Neurol India 2011; 59: 788-9.

    9) Kaloostian P, Kim J, Calabresi P, Bydon A, Witham T. Clay-shoveler's fracture during indoor rock climbing. Orthopedics 2013; 36: 381-3.

    10) Özdemir S, Aksel G. Clay Shoveler’s Fracture: Case Report. Bosphorus Medical Journal 2017; 4: 95-6.

    11) Koç A,Karabıyık Ö, Tokmak TT, Özaşlamacı A, Özdemir M, Türk G. Demonstration of craniocervical junction abnormalities for diagnosis of atlanto-occipital assimilation using MRI. Anatomy 2018; 12: 76-82.

  • Top
  • Summary
  • Introduction
  • Case Presentation
  • Discussion
  • References
  • [ Başa Dön ] [ Özet ] [ PDF ] [ Benzer Makaleler ] [ Yazara E-Posta ] [ Editöre E-Posta ]
    [ Ana Sayfa | Editörler | Danışma Kurulu | Dergi Hakkında | İçindekiler | Arşiv | Yayın Arama | Yazarlara Bilgi | E-Posta ]