Protocol: This experimental study was undertaken at the Experimental Animal Laboratory, Fırat University following approval from the Ethics Committee of Fırat University. All experimental manipulations were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Animals: A total of 28 regularly menstruating female Wistar-Albino rats weighing between 200 and 220 g were housed in cages of 7 with 12-h cycles of light and darkness and were fed with standard pellet food and tap water. Twelve hours prior to experimentation, food intake was discontinued and only water was allowed.
Experimental Groups: Rats were randomly allocated into the following four groups:
Group 1(n=7): The abdominal cavity was opened and closed 15 minutes after oral placebo.
Group 2(n=7): A 2-cm linear incision was made in the right uterine horn and the abdominal cavity was then closed using 4/0 vicryl sutures 15 minutes after oral placebo.
Group 3(n=7): A 2-cm linear incision was made in the right uterine horn and the abdominal cavity was then closed using 4/0 vicryl sutures 15 minutes after oral administration of clarithromycin at a dose of 10 mg/kg (Klacid oral suspension 125 mg/5 ml, Abbott, Italy).
Group 4 (n=7): A 2-cm linear incision was made in the right uterine horn and the abdominal cavity was closed using 4/0 vicryl sutures 15 minutes after orally administered tetracycline ( Monodoks 100 mg kapsül, Deva Ilaç, Tekirdağ) at a dose of 10 mg/kg.
Experimental Design: Anesthesia in rats was induced by Ketamine (Ketalar, EczacıbaĢı Warner- Lambert, Ġstanbul, Turkey) 60 mg/kg and Xylazine (Rompun, Bayer, Ġstanbul, Turkey) 7 mg/kg administered intramuscularly in the left hind extremity. The rats were placed on the surgical table in the supine position. The surgical area was cleaned by 10% povidone and a midline abdominal incision was made. A 2 cm longitudinal midline incision was made in the right uterine horn in all rats at the anti-mesenteric side. Then the incision was closed using 4/0 vicryl and abdominal layers were closed using 3/0 continuous silk sutures. Fifteen days after the initial procedure, a transverse subcostal incision was made again in all rats under general anesthesia and the incisions in the abdominal cavity and uterine horns were examined.
Adhesion Assessment and the Adhesion Severity Score: Adhesions in the uterine horn, intra-abdominal organs, and abdominal wall were evaluated by independent surgeons outside the study team who used the method proposed by Linsky et al.13 to score the extent and severity of the adhesions as follows:
Adhesion size:
No adhesions = 0 points,
Adhesions in 25% of the traumatized area = 1 point,
Adhesions in 25% to 50 of the traumatized area = 2 points
Adhesions in 50% to 100% of the traumatized area = 3 points.
Adhesion severity:
No resistance to surgical separation = 0 point
Moderate resistance to surgical separation= 0.5 points
Significant resistance requiring sharp dissection = 1 point
Histological examination: The traumatized uterine horn including adhesions was promptly removed, fixed in 10% formaldehyde. Paraffin blocks were prepared for histologic and histochemical assays. The 5 to 6 μm thick cross-sections obtained from the paraffin blocks were stained with Masson's trichrome staining. Histopathologic assessment of fibrosis was based on the semi-quantitative scoring system proposed by Hooker et al.14. Accordingly, histopathologic adhesion was graded between 0 and 3 based on the presence and extent of fibrosis as follows: Grade 0, no fibrosis; Grade I, mild fibrosis; Grade II, moderate fibrosis; and Grade III, severe fibrosis.
Immunohistochemical examination: The 5–6 μm thick cross-sections prepared from paraffin blocks were placed on polylysine coated microscopic slides. Routine immunohistochemical staining was performed according to Kuloğlu et al.'s15 method, and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor, E2611, Spring Bioscience, USA) and MDA (Rabbit polyclonal Anti-Malondialdehyde antibody, ab6463, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) immunoreactivity were studied with avidin-biotin-peroxidase methodology. Light microscopy and photography were done using an Olympus BX 50 light microscopy. The cytoplasmic immune staining was graded in a 5-point scale in the following manner: 0, no staining; 1, suspicious staining; 2, mild; 3, moderate; 4, strongly positive.
Inflammatory reaction was also graded similarly: 0, none; 1, trivial; 2, mild; 3, moderate; and 4, strong.
Statistical analyses: Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Il, USA). A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was performed. For pairwise comparisons between groups for parameters with a p value of less than 0.05 Mann-Whitney U test was used. Again, for p values of less than 0.05 a MWU test was done with Bonferroni correction (0.05/6 = 0.008). A p value of less than 0.008 was considered significant.