Correction of reversible factors that have been shown to have an effect on mortality in CTO patients is likely to have a positive effect on the quality of life and life expectancy of patients. Moreover, the use of indices calculated by simple blood markers in the follow-up of patients can be highly beneficial. CONUT and PNI are objective indices used for assessing nutritional status and have been shown to be independently associated with cardiovascular events
10. A recent study reported that in STEMI patients, the nutritional status evaluated by the CONUT score, in addition to other comorbidities, may affect the prognosis particularly in elderly patients
11. In our study, a relationship was found between high CONUT and low PNI scores and all-cause mortality over the median follow-up period of 48 months. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant differentiation over time between groups that were divided according to scores. In CTO, patients can continue their lives without being affected by the disease despite having at least one fully occluded artery for a long period of time, which shows that such patients have a good nutritional status. In our study, it was noteworthy that there were very few patients with severe malnutrition. In addition, the effect of nutrition on mortality was remarkably high in our patient group, whose nutritional status was evaluated to be sufficiently good. This finding indicates that these scoring systems may be more valuable than their value reported in the literature.
Successful recanalization of CTO has been shown to result in improved LVEF and regional wall motion 9. In our study, a significant relationship was found between low LVEF and the mortality risk and heart failure was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. These findings suggest that LVEF should be monitored closely since it may be useful in the prediction of the prognosis.
Studies investigating CTO and stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) have shown that successful interventional therapy has a positive effect on survival in patients with increased myocardial ischemia 12. This benefit is often considered to result from a reduction in ischemic burden with successful PCI in patients with greater ischemic burden 13. The present study evaluated 516 CTO patients and revealed that successful PCI reduced the risk of all-cause mortality over a median follow-up period of 48 months. Nonetheless, the criteria used in the selection of the intervention methods administered in our patients were not clearly examined, and thus it may be inappropriate to consider that PCI is superior to CABG in intervention therapy.
A previous study followed up 1092 CTO patients for medium period of 39 months and reported that the presence of chronic kidney disease increased the frequency of events and all-cause death. The authors also noted that all the patients, regardless of the presence of chronic kidney disease, benefited from revascularization, although this benefit was lower in patients with chronic kidney disease 14. Similarly, in our study, a significant relationship was found between the presence of chronic kidney disease and mortality in favor of poor prognosis.
In the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis, good CCC may improve myocardial ischemia, preserve myocardial contractility, improve clinical symptoms, reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction, and reduce myocardial infarct size, thereby leading to reduced mortality from ischemic events 15,16. A recent study evaluated 128 CTO patients and found a positive correlation between increased serum albumin level and good CCC development and also found a negative correlation between diabetes and CCC devel-opment 17. In our study, low serum albumin level and high blood glucose level were found to have a significant relationship with all-cause mortality. Based on these findings, we consider that the close relationship between these parameter changes and CCC development is a clear indication of the importance of CCC development in coronary artery diseases.
Limitations
Our study was limited since it had a retrospective design and thus did not evaluate the changes in laboratory parameters during the follow-up period. Additionally, it also could not assess other parameters associated with malnutrition during blood sampling, such as body mass index (BMI), and thus could not evaluate malnutrition thoroughly.