Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) is defined as a 30 dB loss over 3 continuous frequencies occurring in less than 3 days
6. If the reason is not clear the name of the disease becomes Idiopathic Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISHL).
The etiology of the ISHL, is still unknown, what makes the topic still very controversial. In only 10% of the cases the cause can be found. One of the few emergencies in otology, the ISHL affects mostly those in their fourth decade of life, involving both the right and the left ears in equal proportions, and the 90% is unila-teral7,8. The incidence is estimated at approximately 10 cases per 100,000 population1. Because of the fact that the patients who had spontaneously remission did not seek help, the real incidence may be higher than thought. Several factors have been postulated to elicit the etiology of ISHL. The most recent studies concerning the possible causes of sudden hearing loss suggest vascular disorders, rupture of the inner ear membrane and autoimmune diseases; however, viral infections have received a great deal of attention in recent years9. Little is known about the mechanism of sudden hearing loss.
Viruses can cause sudden hearing loss in an acute infection, however the latent form, and its possible reactivation have also been considered as explanations of the cochlear injury mechanism. Even though hearing loss can be explained by a blood viscosity change, experimental and clinical studies do not show any evidence of labyrinthine fibrosis and new bone formation, or labyrinthine membrane breaks. These findings are not in agreement with vascular and rupture membrane factors, respectively. Although acute viral infections may cause such damage, latent infections and their reactivation may also explain the lesion. The main latent viruses are part of the group of herpes virus: they are ubiquitous, bear strong neurotropism as characteristic; they not always cause symptoms (subclinical infection) and have complex relation with ISHL. The other viruses varicella-zoster (VZV), cytomegalovirus, influenza, parainfluenza A, B, C, mumps, measles, rubella, rhinovirus and the Epstein-Barr10,11. Almost all the SHL cases caused by virus are unilateral. The bilateral occurrence is rare. Depending on the viral agent, the hearing loss may present a certain pattern. For example, mumps courses with severe and irreversible HL, while HL caused by VZV is of low severity and reversible.
Although SSNHL is a well-recognized condition, no standard definition or treatment protocol has been accepted. Multiple factors have limited the ability to develop standard definition and treatment protocols for SSNHL. Limited understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease has as its consequence the lack of an effective treatment. It has become clear that this disorder is not the result of a single disease process. Confounding the issue is the high spontaneous recovery rate. Most studies report a spontaneous recovery in 45% to 65% of patients12.
Steroids have become the most widely accepted treatment option for SSHL on the basis of their anti-inflammatory effect. Owing to the differences in the etiopathogenesis of SSHL, different therapeutic strategies have been applied. These include steroids alone or combined with vasodilators, hyperbaric oxygen, inhaled carbogen, anticoagulants, antiviral, or even cytotoxic medications.Though some reports claim that their treatments were effective, there is no universal agreement on what is the “best” treatment protocol.
Several factors affect the prognosis directly. They include the age of the patient, the audiometric pattern of hearing loss, the presence or absence of vertigo, and the interval between the onset of SSNHL and the reception of treatment within 6 days13. Age, time between onset and treatment, and audiogram type are shown to be significantly related to outcome. The best prognosis is in patients with midfrequency loss pattern, as reported in other studies.On the other hand prognosis is worse in children and over 60 years14. Recently HSP70 has been an important marker in treatment and following of the disease15.
In order to investigate risc factors for ISHL a lot of case-control study were done in past. Nakashima et al.16 reported that those who ate many fresh vege-tables were at a decreased risc for sudden deafness. If we look at the etiological factors of sudden deafness we can see that the disease is multifarious. So that the patient’s own anatomical structure can be a risk factor for sudden deafness.
In the study by Weber et al.17, it was demonstrated that steroid treatment improved the hearing via decreasing the suppression on edematous nerve in the internal acoustics channel, as showed by MRI. In this way, a narrow internal acoustic channel diameter can be a risk factor for sudden deafness theoretically. In the present study, there was no statistically significant difference between the patients’ affected and unaffected ears (p>0.05). However, the mean diameter of affected side of the patients was narrower than those of healthy controls (p<0.05).
Anemia, disturbance of iron metabolism, smoking and drinking habits have been incriminated as risk factors of sudden deafness in previous studies. The purpose of our study was to determine the corelation between internal acoustic channel diameter and ISHL. When we compare our results with control group, we have shown that the diameter of the channel can be significantly related to sudden deafness. In addition, according to our data, a narrow channel can be a risc factor. On the other hand further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the risk factors about the disease.